2004 Isuzu Rodeo vs. 2009 Mazda 6
To start off, 2009 Mazda 6 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Isuzu Rodeo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Isuzu Rodeo would be higher. At 3,726 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda 6 (272 HP) has 22 more horse power than 2004 Isuzu Rodeo. (250 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 2004 Isuzu Rodeo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Isuzu Rodeo weights approximately 665 kg more than 2009 Mazda 6.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mazda 6 (365 Nm) has 31 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Isuzu Rodeo. (334 Nm). This means 2009 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Isuzu Rodeo.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Isuzu Rodeo | 2009 Mazda 6 | |
| Make | Isuzu | Mazda |
| Model | Rodeo | 6 |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2009 |
| Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3491 cc | 3726 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 250 HP | 272 HP |
| Torque | 334 Nm | 365 Nm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.3:1 | 10.0:1 |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1790 kg | 1125 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4520 mm | 4930 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1850 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1480 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2800 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Highway | 10.4 L/100km | 9.4 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 13.2 L/100km | 13.8 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.9 L/100km | 11.8 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 74 L | 70 L |
