2004 Isuzu Rodeo vs. 2009 Volvo XC70
To start off, 2009 Volvo XC70 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Isuzu Rodeo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Isuzu Rodeo would be higher. At 3,491 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Isuzu Rodeo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Volvo XC70 (281 HP) has 31 more horse power than 2004 Isuzu Rodeo. (250 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Volvo XC70 should accelerate faster than 2004 Isuzu Rodeo.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Volvo XC70 (400 Nm) has 66 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Isuzu Rodeo. (334 Nm). This means 2009 Volvo XC70 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Isuzu Rodeo.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Isuzu Rodeo | 2009 Volvo XC70 | |
| Make | Isuzu | Volvo |
| Model | Rodeo | XC70 |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2009 |
| Body Type | SUV | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3491 cc | 2953 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 250 HP | 281 HP |
| Torque | 334 Nm | 400 Nm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.3:1 | 18.3:1 |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4520 mm | 4850 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1870 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1610 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2820 mm |
| Fuel Consumption | 10.4 L/100km | 10.7 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 13.2 L/100km | 15.7 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.9 L/100km | 13.1 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 74 L | 70 L |
