2004 Isuzu Rodeo vs. 2010 Acura RDX
To start off, 2010 Acura RDX is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Isuzu Rodeo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Isuzu Rodeo would be higher. At 3,163 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Isuzu Rodeo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Acura RDX (240 HP) has 35 more horse power than 2004 Isuzu Rodeo. (205 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Acura RDX should accelerate faster than 2004 Isuzu Rodeo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Isuzu Rodeo weights approximately 91 kg more than 2010 Acura RDX.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Acura RDX (352 Nm) has 62 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Isuzu Rodeo. (290 Nm). This means 2010 Acura RDX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Isuzu Rodeo.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Isuzu Rodeo | 2010 Acura RDX | |
Make | Isuzu | Acura |
Model | Rodeo | RDX |
Year Released | 2004 | 2010 |
Body Type | SUV | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3163 cc | 2300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 205 HP | 240 HP |
Torque | 290 Nm | 352 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | AWD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1874 kg | 1783 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4520 mm | 4636 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1869 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1654 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2649 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 10.2 L/100km | 10.7 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 13.8 L/100km | 13.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 74 L | 68 L |