2004 Isuzu Rodeo vs. 2010 Citroen C5
To start off, 2010 Citroen C5 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Isuzu Rodeo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Isuzu Rodeo would be higher. At 3,491 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Isuzu Rodeo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Isuzu Rodeo (250 HP) has 136 more horse power than 2010 Citroen C5. (114 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Isuzu Rodeo should accelerate faster than 2010 Citroen C5. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Isuzu Rodeo weights approximately 425 kg more than 2010 Citroen C5. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Isuzu Rodeo (334 Nm) has 174 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Citroen C5. (160 Nm). This means 2004 Isuzu Rodeo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Citroen C5.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Isuzu Rodeo | 2010 Citroen C5 | |
Make | Isuzu | Citroen |
Model | Rodeo | C5 |
Year Released | 2004 | 2010 |
Body Type | SUV | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3491 cc | 1747 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 250 HP | 114 HP |
Torque | 334 Nm | 160 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 93 mm | 82.7 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 85 mm | 81.4 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.3:1 | 11.0:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1790 kg | 1365 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4520 mm | 4620 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2760 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.9 L/100km | 7.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 74 L | 66 L |