2004 Isuzu Rodeo vs. 2010 Fiat Panda
To start off, 2010 Fiat Panda is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Isuzu Rodeo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Isuzu Rodeo would be higher. At 3,491 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Isuzu Rodeo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Isuzu Rodeo (250 HP) has 197 more horse power than 2010 Fiat Panda. (53 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Isuzu Rodeo should accelerate faster than 2010 Fiat Panda. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Isuzu Rodeo weights approximately 875 kg more than 2010 Fiat Panda. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Isuzu Rodeo (334 Nm) has 246 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Fiat Panda. (88 Nm). This means 2004 Isuzu Rodeo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Fiat Panda.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Isuzu Rodeo | 2010 Fiat Panda | |
Make | Isuzu | Fiat |
Model | Rodeo | Panda |
Year Released | 2004 | 2010 |
Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3491 cc | 1107 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 250 HP | 53 HP |
Torque | 334 Nm | 88 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 93 mm | 70 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 85 mm | 72 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.3:1 | 9.6:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1790 kg | 915 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4520 mm | 3540 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1600 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1550 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2310 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.9 L/100km | 5.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 74 L | 35 L |