2004 Isuzu Rodeo vs. 2010 GMC Envoy
To start off, 2010 GMC Envoy is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Isuzu Rodeo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Isuzu Rodeo would be higher. At 4,161 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 GMC Envoy is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 GMC Envoy (281 HP) has 31 more horse power than 2004 Isuzu Rodeo. (250 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 GMC Envoy should accelerate faster than 2004 Isuzu Rodeo.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Isuzu Rodeo (334 Nm) has 57 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 GMC Envoy. (277 Nm). This means 2004 Isuzu Rodeo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 GMC Envoy.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Isuzu Rodeo | 2010 GMC Envoy | |
| Make | Isuzu | GMC |
| Model | Rodeo | Envoy |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2010 |
| Body Type | SUV | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3491 cc | 4161 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 250 HP | 281 HP |
| Torque | 334 Nm | 277 Nm |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4520 mm | 4870 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1900 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1830 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2950 mm |
| Fuel Consumption | 10.4 L/100km | 11.8 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 13.2 L/100km | 16.8 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 74 L | 83 L |
