2004 Isuzu Rodeo vs. 2010 Hummer H3
To start off, 2010 Hummer H3 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Isuzu Rodeo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Isuzu Rodeo would be higher. At 3,651 cc (5 cylinders), 2010 Hummer H3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Isuzu Rodeo (250 HP) has 8 more horse power than 2010 Hummer H3. (242 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Isuzu Rodeo should accelerate faster than 2010 Hummer H3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Hummer H3 weights approximately 410 kg more than 2004 Isuzu Rodeo.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Isuzu Rodeo (334 Nm) has 6 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Hummer H3. (328 Nm). This means 2004 Isuzu Rodeo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Hummer H3.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Isuzu Rodeo | 2010 Hummer H3 | |
Make | Isuzu | Hummer |
Model | Rodeo | H3 |
Year Released | 2004 | 2010 |
Body Type | SUV | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3491 cc | 3651 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 250 HP | 242 HP |
Torque | 334 Nm | 328 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 93 mm | 95.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 85 mm | 102 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.3:1 | 10.0:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1790 kg | 2200 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4520 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1900 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 2000 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2850 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.9 L/100km | 14.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 74 L | 87 L |