2004 Isuzu Rodeo vs. 2010 Nissan NP300
To start off, 2010 Nissan NP300 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Isuzu Rodeo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Isuzu Rodeo would be higher. At 3,491 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Isuzu Rodeo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Isuzu Rodeo (250 HP) has 119 more horse power than 2010 Nissan NP300. (131 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Isuzu Rodeo should accelerate faster than 2010 Nissan NP300.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Isuzu Rodeo (334 Nm) has 30 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Nissan NP300. (304 Nm). This means 2004 Isuzu Rodeo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Nissan NP300.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Isuzu Rodeo | 2010 Nissan NP300 | |
Make | Isuzu | Nissan |
Model | Rodeo | NP300 |
Year Released | 2004 | 2010 |
Body Type | SUV | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3491 cc | 2486 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 250 HP | 131 HP |
Torque | 334 Nm | 304 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.3:1 | 16.5:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4520 mm | 5180 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1630 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2960 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 74 L | 75 L |