2004 Isuzu Rodeo vs. 2011 Ford E-350
To start off, 2011 Ford E-350 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Isuzu Rodeo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Isuzu Rodeo would be higher. At 5,400 cc (8 cylinders), 2011 Ford E-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Ford E-350 (255 HP) has 5 more horse power than 2004 Isuzu Rodeo. (250 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Ford E-350 should accelerate faster than 2004 Isuzu Rodeo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Ford E-350 weights approximately 950 kg more than 2004 Isuzu Rodeo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 Isuzu Rodeo is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2011 Ford E-350. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Isuzu Rodeo will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Ford E-350 (474 Nm) has 140 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Isuzu Rodeo. (334 Nm). This means 2011 Ford E-350 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Isuzu Rodeo.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Isuzu Rodeo | 2011 Ford E-350 | |
Make | Isuzu | Ford |
Model | Rodeo | E-350 |
Year Released | 2004 | 2011 |
Body Type | SUV | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3491 cc | 5400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 250 HP | 255 HP |
Torque | 334 Nm | 474 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1880 kg | 2830 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4520 mm | 5504 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 2017 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 2111 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 3505 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 11.2 L/100km | 15.7 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 13.8 L/100km | 21.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 74 L | 125 L |