2004 Isuzu Rodeo vs. 2012 Kia Sedona
To start off, 2012 Kia Sedona is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Isuzu Rodeo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Isuzu Rodeo would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Kia Sedona is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Kia Sedona (271 HP) has 21 more horse power than 2004 Isuzu Rodeo. (250 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Kia Sedona should accelerate faster than 2004 Isuzu Rodeo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Kia Sedona weights approximately 194 kg more than 2004 Isuzu Rodeo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2012 Kia Sedona (336 Nm) has 2 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Isuzu Rodeo. (334 Nm). This means 2012 Kia Sedona will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Isuzu Rodeo.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Isuzu Rodeo | 2012 Kia Sedona | |
| Make | Isuzu | Kia |
| Model | Rodeo | Sedona |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2012 |
| Body Type | SUV | Minivan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3491 cc | 3500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 250 HP | 271 HP |
| Torque | 334 Nm | 336 Nm |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1790 kg | 1984 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4520 mm | 5131 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1984 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1816 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 3020 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Highway | 10.4 L/100km | 9.4 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 13.2 L/100km | 13.1 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 74 L | 80 L |
