2004 Isuzu Rodeo vs. 2012 Land Rover Freelander
To start off, 2012 Land Rover Freelander is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Isuzu Rodeo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Isuzu Rodeo would be higher. At 3,491 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Isuzu Rodeo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Isuzu Rodeo (250 HP) has 92 more horse power than 2012 Land Rover Freelander. (158 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Isuzu Rodeo should accelerate faster than 2012 Land Rover Freelander. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Land Rover Freelander weights approximately 842 kg more than 2004 Isuzu Rodeo.
Let's talk about torque, 2012 Land Rover Freelander (400 Nm) has 66 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Isuzu Rodeo. (334 Nm). This means 2012 Land Rover Freelander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Isuzu Rodeo.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Isuzu Rodeo | 2012 Land Rover Freelander | |
Make | Isuzu | Land Rover |
Model | Rodeo | Freelander |
Year Released | 2004 | 2012 |
Body Type | SUV | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3491 cc | 2179 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 250 HP | 158 HP |
Torque | 334 Nm | 400 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 93 mm | 85 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 85 mm | 96 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.3:1 | 16.5:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1790 kg | 2632 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4520 mm | 4510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1750 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1930 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2670 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.9 L/100km | 24.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 74 L | 68 L |