2004 Isuzu Rodeo vs. 2012 Lincoln MKZ
To start off, 2012 Lincoln MKZ is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Isuzu Rodeo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Isuzu Rodeo would be higher. At 3,491 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Isuzu Rodeo is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Isuzu Rodeo weights approximately 178 kg more than 2012 Lincoln MKZ.
Because 2004 Isuzu Rodeo is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Lincoln MKZ. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Isuzu Rodeo will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Isuzu Rodeo | 2012 Lincoln MKZ | |
| Make | Isuzu | Lincoln |
| Model | Rodeo | MKZ |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2012 |
| Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3491 cc | 2500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 250 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1880 kg | 1702 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4520 mm | 4821 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1834 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2728 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Highway | 11.2 L/100km | 6.5 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 13.8 L/100km | 5.7 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 74 L | 66 L |
