2004 Isuzu Rodeo vs. 2013 Chevrolet Silverado
To start off, 2013 Chevrolet Silverado is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Isuzu Rodeo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Isuzu Rodeo would be higher. At 4,800 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Chevrolet Silverado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Chevrolet Silverado (298 HP) has 48 more horse power than 2004 Isuzu Rodeo. (250 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Chevrolet Silverado should accelerate faster than 2004 Isuzu Rodeo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Chevrolet Silverado weights approximately 237 kg more than 2004 Isuzu Rodeo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2013 Chevrolet Silverado (414 Nm) has 80 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Isuzu Rodeo. (334 Nm). This means 2013 Chevrolet Silverado will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Isuzu Rodeo.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Isuzu Rodeo | 2013 Chevrolet Silverado | |
Make | Isuzu | Chevrolet |
Model | Rodeo | Silverado |
Year Released | 2004 | 2013 |
Body Type | SUV | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3491 cc | 4800 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 250 HP | 298 HP |
Torque | 334 Nm | 414 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 93 mm | 96 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 85 mm | 83 mm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 3 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1790 kg | 2027 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4520 mm | 5222 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 2029 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1875 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 3023 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 10.4 L/100km | 10.5 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 13.2 L/100km | 15.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 74 L | 98 L |