2004 Isuzu Rodeo vs. 2013 Smart Fortwo
To start off, 2013 Smart Fortwo is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Isuzu Rodeo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Isuzu Rodeo would be higher. At 3,163 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Isuzu Rodeo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Isuzu Rodeo (205 HP) has 134 more horse power than 2013 Smart Fortwo. (71 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Isuzu Rodeo should accelerate faster than 2013 Smart Fortwo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Isuzu Rodeo weights approximately 1034 kg more than 2013 Smart Fortwo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 Isuzu Rodeo is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2013 Smart Fortwo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Isuzu Rodeo will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Isuzu Rodeo (290 Nm) has 198 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Smart Fortwo. (92 Nm). This means 2004 Isuzu Rodeo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Smart Fortwo.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Isuzu Rodeo | 2013 Smart Fortwo | |
| Make | Isuzu | Smart |
| Model | Rodeo | Fortwo |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2013 |
| Body Type | SUV | Convertible |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 3163 cc | 1000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 205 HP | 71 HP |
| Torque | 290 Nm | 92 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 93 mm | 72 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 77 mm | 81 mm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1874 kg | 840 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4520 mm | 2695 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1559 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1542 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 1867 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Highway | 10.2 L/100km | 4.7 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 13.8 L/100km | 5.8 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 74 L | 33 L |
