2004 Jaguar X-Type vs. 1983 Mercury Lynx
To start off, 2004 Jaguar X-Type is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Mercury Lynx. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Mercury Lynx would be higher. At 2,491 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Jaguar X-Type is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Jaguar X-Type (192 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 141 more horse power than 1983 Mercury Lynx. (51 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Jaguar X-Type should accelerate faster than 1983 Mercury Lynx. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Jaguar X-Type weights approximately 505 kg more than 1983 Mercury Lynx. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Jaguar X-Type (242 Nm) has 131 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Mercury Lynx. (111 Nm). This means 2004 Jaguar X-Type will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Mercury Lynx.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Jaguar X-Type | 1983 Mercury Lynx | |
Make | Jaguar | Mercury |
Model | X-Type | Lynx |
Year Released | 2004 | 1983 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2491 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 192 HP | 51 HP |
Engine RPM | 6100 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 242 Nm | 111 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1555 kg | 1050 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4680 mm | 4170 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2720 mm | 2400 mm |