2004 Jaguar XJ vs. 1972 Mazda Cosmo
To start off, 2004 Jaguar XJ is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 4,195 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Jaguar XJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Jaguar XJ (295 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 202 more horse power than 1972 Mazda Cosmo. (93 HP @ 7000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Jaguar XJ should accelerate faster than 1972 Mazda Cosmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Jaguar XJ weights approximately 783 kg more than 1972 Mazda Cosmo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Jaguar XJ (411 Nm) has 278 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Mazda Cosmo. (133 Nm). This means 2004 Jaguar XJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Mazda Cosmo.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Jaguar XJ | 1972 Mazda Cosmo | |
Make | Jaguar | Mazda |
Model | XJ | Cosmo |
Year Released | 2004 | 1972 |
Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4195 cc | 1964 cc |
Horse Power | 295 HP | 93 HP |
Engine RPM | 6100 RPM | 7000 RPM |
Torque | 411 Nm | 133 Nm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1725 kg | 942 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5100 mm | 4150 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1600 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1170 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3170 mm | 2210 mm |