2004 Jaguar XJ vs. 1993 Renault Clio
To start off, 2004 Jaguar XJ is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 Renault Clio. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 Renault Clio would be higher. At 4,195 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Jaguar XJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Jaguar XJ (295 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 157 more horse power than 1993 Renault Clio. (138 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Jaguar XJ should accelerate faster than 1993 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Jaguar XJ weights approximately 750 kg more than 1993 Renault Clio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Jaguar XJ (411 Nm) has 224 more torque (in Nm) than 1993 Renault Clio. (187 Nm). This means 2004 Jaguar XJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1993 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Jaguar XJ | 1993 Renault Clio | |
| Make | Jaguar | Renault |
| Model | XJ | Clio |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1993 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
| Engine Size | 4195 cc | 1764 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 295 HP | 138 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6100 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Torque | 411 Nm | 187 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 86 mm | 82 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 90 mm | 83.5 mm |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1725 kg | 975 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5100 mm | 3710 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1400 mm |
