2004 Jaguar XJ vs. 2002 Suzuki F1
To start off, 2004 Jaguar XJ is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Suzuki F1. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Suzuki F1 would be higher. At 4,195 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Jaguar XJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Jaguar XJ (294 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 227 more horse power than 2002 Suzuki F1. (67 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Jaguar XJ should accelerate faster than 2002 Suzuki F1. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Jaguar XJ weights approximately 240 kg more than 2002 Suzuki F1. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Jaguar XJ (411 Nm) has 305 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Suzuki F1. (106 Nm). This means 2004 Jaguar XJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Suzuki F1.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Jaguar XJ | 2002 Suzuki F1 | |
| Make | Jaguar | Suzuki |
| Model | XJ | F1 |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 4195 cc | 1995 cc |
| Horse Power | 294 HP | 67 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6100 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 411 Nm | 106 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1710 kg | 1470 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 3040 mm | 2210 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 85 L | 45 L |
