2004 Jaguar XJ vs. 2009 Lada 21
To start off, 2009 Lada 21 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Jaguar XJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Jaguar XJ would be higher. At 4,193 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Jaguar XJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Jaguar XJ (400 HP) has 311 more horse power than 2009 Lada 21. (89 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Jaguar XJ should accelerate faster than 2009 Lada 21. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Jaguar XJ weights approximately 619 kg more than 2009 Lada 21. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 Jaguar XJ is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Jaguar XJ. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Lada 21, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Jaguar XJ (553 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 422 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Lada 21. (131 Nm @ 3700 RPM). This means 2004 Jaguar XJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Lada 21. 2004 Jaguar XJ has automatic transmission and 2009 Lada 21 has manual transmission. 2009 Lada 21 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2004 Jaguar XJ will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Jaguar XJ | 2009 Lada 21 | |
Make | Jaguar | Lada |
Model | XJ | 21 |
Year Released | 2004 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4193 cc | 1594 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 400 HP | 89 HP |
Torque | 553 Nm | 131 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3700 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 86 mm | 82 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90.3 mm | 75.6 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.1:1 | 10.3:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1689 kg | 1070 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5220 mm | 4180 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3170 mm | 2500 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 12.3 L/100km | 7.3 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 85 L | 43 L |