2004 Jaguar XJ vs. 2009 Nissan 350Z
To start off, 2009 Nissan 350Z is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Jaguar XJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Jaguar XJ would be higher. At 4,195 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Jaguar XJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Nissan 350Z (309 HP @ 6800 RPM) has 14 more horse power than 2004 Jaguar XJ. (295 HP @ 6100 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Nissan 350Z should accelerate faster than 2004 Jaguar XJ.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Jaguar XJ (411 Nm) has 53 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Nissan 350Z. (358 Nm). This means 2004 Jaguar XJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Nissan 350Z. 2004 Jaguar XJ has automatic transmission and 2009 Nissan 350Z has manual transmission. 2009 Nissan 350Z will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2004 Jaguar XJ will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Jaguar XJ | 2009 Nissan 350Z | |
Make | Jaguar | Nissan |
Model | XJ | 350Z |
Year Released | 2004 | 2009 |
Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4195 cc | 3498 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 295 HP | 309 HP |
Engine RPM | 6100 RPM | 6800 RPM |
Torque | 411 Nm | 358 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 86 mm | 95.6 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90 mm | 81.4 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 11.0:1 | 10.3:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5100 mm | 4320 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1330 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1820 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3170 mm | 2660 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.7 L/100km | 13.1 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 85 L | 80 L |