2004 Jaguar XJ vs. 2013 Acura RDX
To start off, 2013 Acura RDX is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Jaguar XJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Jaguar XJ would be higher. At 4,195 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Jaguar XJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Jaguar XJ (295 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 55 more horse power than 2013 Acura RDX. (240 HP @ 6200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Jaguar XJ should accelerate faster than 2013 Acura RDX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Acura RDX weights approximately 24 kg more than 2004 Jaguar XJ.
Because 2013 Acura RDX is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 Jaguar XJ. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Acura RDX will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Jaguar XJ (411 Nm) has 71 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Acura RDX. (340 Nm). This means 2004 Jaguar XJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Acura RDX.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Jaguar XJ | 2013 Acura RDX | |
Make | Jaguar | Acura |
Model | XJ | RDX |
Year Released | 2004 | 2013 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4195 cc | 2300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 295 HP | 240 HP |
Engine RPM | 6100 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Torque | 411 Nm | 340 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 86 mm | 89 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90 mm | 93 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1725 kg | 1749 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5100 mm | 4660 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1872 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1678 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3170 mm | 2685 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 8.4 L/100km | 7.3 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 13.1 L/100km | 10.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 85 L | 60 L |