2004 Jaguar XJ vs. 2013 Kia Optima
To start off, 2013 Kia Optima is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Jaguar XJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Jaguar XJ would be higher. At 4,194 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Jaguar XJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Jaguar XJ (300 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 103 more horse power than 2013 Kia Optima. (197 HP @ 6300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Jaguar XJ should accelerate faster than 2013 Kia Optima. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Jaguar XJ weights approximately 185 kg more than 2013 Kia Optima. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 Jaguar XJ is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Jaguar XJ. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Kia Optima, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Jaguar XJ (420 Nm @ 4100 RPM) has 168 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Kia Optima. (252 Nm @ 4250 RPM). This means 2004 Jaguar XJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Kia Optima. 2004 Jaguar XJ has automatic transmission and 2013 Kia Optima has manual transmission. 2013 Kia Optima will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2004 Jaguar XJ will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Jaguar XJ | 2013 Kia Optima | |
Make | Jaguar | Kia |
Model | XJ | Optima |
Year Released | 2004 | 2013 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4194 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 300 HP | 197 HP |
Engine RPM | 6100 RPM | 6300 RPM |
Torque | 420 Nm | 252 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4100 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 86 mm | 88 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90.3 mm | 97 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1639 kg | 1454 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5220 mm | 4845 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1455 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3040 mm | 2795 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 8.1 L/100km | 5.7 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 16 L/100km | 8.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 85 L | 70 L |