2004 Jaguar XK vs. 1962 Lotus Seven
To start off, 2004 Jaguar XK is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Lotus Seven. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Lotus Seven would be higher. At 4,196 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Jaguar XK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Jaguar XK (390 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 352 more horse power than 1962 Lotus Seven. (38 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Jaguar XK should accelerate faster than 1962 Lotus Seven. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Jaguar XK weights approximately 1328 kg more than 1962 Lotus Seven. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Jaguar XK | 1962 Lotus Seven | |
Make | Jaguar | Lotus |
Model | XK | Seven |
Year Released | 2004 | 1962 |
Body Type | Coupe | Roadster |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4196 cc | 997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 390 HP | 38 HP |
Engine RPM | 6100 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1758 kg | 430 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 3360 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1490 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1280 mm | 1100 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2590 mm | 2240 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 29 L |