2004 Jaguar XK vs. 1962 Lotus Seven
To start off, 2004 Jaguar XK is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Lotus Seven. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Lotus Seven would be higher. At 4,195 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Jaguar XK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Jaguar XK (294 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 200 more horse power than 1962 Lotus Seven. (94 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Jaguar XK should accelerate faster than 1962 Lotus Seven. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Jaguar XK weights approximately 1335 kg more than 1962 Lotus Seven. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Jaguar XK | 1962 Lotus Seven | |
Make | Jaguar | Lotus |
Model | XK | Seven |
Year Released | 2004 | 1962 |
Body Type | Convertible | Roadster |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4195 cc | 1498 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 294 HP | 94 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1805 kg | 470 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 3360 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1490 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1100 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2590 mm | 2240 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 29 L |