2004 Jaguar XK vs. 1963 Steyr 650T
To start off, 2004 Jaguar XK is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Steyr 650T. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Steyr 650T would be higher. At 4,195 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Jaguar XK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Jaguar XK (294 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 274 more horse power than 1963 Steyr 650T. (20 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Jaguar XK should accelerate faster than 1963 Steyr 650T. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Jaguar XK weights approximately 1305 kg more than 1963 Steyr 650T. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Jaguar XK (411 Nm) has 371 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Steyr 650T. (40 Nm). This means 2004 Jaguar XK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Steyr 650T.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Jaguar XK | 1963 Steyr 650T | |
| Make | Jaguar | Steyr |
| Model | XK | 650T |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1963 |
| Engine Size | 4195 cc | 643 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 294 HP | 20 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Torque | 411 Nm | 40 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1805 kg | 500 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 2970 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1330 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1380 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2590 mm | 1850 mm |
