2004 Jaguar XK vs. 1965 Steyr 700C
To start off, 2004 Jaguar XK is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Steyr 700C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Steyr 700C would be higher. At 4,194 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Jaguar XK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Jaguar XK (390 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 370 more horse power than 1965 Steyr 700C. (20 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Jaguar XK should accelerate faster than 1965 Steyr 700C. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Jaguar XK weights approximately 1293 kg more than 1965 Steyr 700C. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Jaguar XK (541 Nm) has 501 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Steyr 700C. (40 Nm). This means 2004 Jaguar XK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Steyr 700C.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Jaguar XK | 1965 Steyr 700C | |
| Make | Jaguar | Steyr |
| Model | XK | 700C |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1965 |
| Engine Size | 4194 cc | 643 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 390 HP | 20 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6100 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Torque | 541 Nm | 40 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1833 kg | 540 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 3190 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1330 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1290 mm | 1360 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2590 mm | 1950 mm |
