2004 Jaguar XK vs. 1965 Triumph 2000
To start off, 2004 Jaguar XK is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 4,195 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Jaguar XK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Jaguar XK (294 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 205 more horse power than 1965 Triumph 2000. (89 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Jaguar XK should accelerate faster than 1965 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Jaguar XK weights approximately 635 kg more than 1965 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Jaguar XK (411 Nm) has 253 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Triumph 2000. (158 Nm). This means 2004 Jaguar XK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Jaguar XK | 1965 Triumph 2000 | |
| Make | Jaguar | Triumph |
| Model | XK | 2000 |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1965 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4195 cc | 1997 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 294 HP | 89 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 411 Nm | 158 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 86.1 mm | 74.7 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 90 mm | 76 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 11.0:1 | 9.3:1 |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1805 kg | 1170 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 4420 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2590 mm | 2700 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 64 L |
