2004 Jaguar XK vs. 1974 Sunbeam Alpine
To start off, 2004 Jaguar XK is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Sunbeam Alpine. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Sunbeam Alpine would be higher. At 4,196 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Jaguar XK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Jaguar XK (390 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 319 more horse power than 1974 Sunbeam Alpine. (71 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Jaguar XK should accelerate faster than 1974 Sunbeam Alpine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Jaguar XK weights approximately 748 kg more than 1974 Sunbeam Alpine. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Jaguar XK (525 Nm) has 402 more torque (in Nm) than 1974 Sunbeam Alpine. (123 Nm). This means 2004 Jaguar XK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1974 Sunbeam Alpine.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Jaguar XK | 1974 Sunbeam Alpine | |
| Make | Jaguar | Sunbeam |
| Model | XK | Alpine |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1974 |
| Engine Size | 4196 cc | 1724 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 390 HP | 71 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6100 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 525 Nm | 123 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1758 kg | 1010 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 4430 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1650 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1280 mm | 1410 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2590 mm | 2510 mm |
