2004 Jaguar XK vs. 1975 Nissan Cedric
To start off, 2004 Jaguar XK is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 4,193 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Jaguar XK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Jaguar XK (390 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 284 more horse power than 1975 Nissan Cedric. (106 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Jaguar XK should accelerate faster than 1975 Nissan Cedric. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Jaguar XK weights approximately 483 kg more than 1975 Nissan Cedric. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Jaguar XK (541 Nm) has 379 more torque (in Nm) than 1975 Nissan Cedric. (162 Nm). This means 2004 Jaguar XK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1975 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Jaguar XK | 1975 Nissan Cedric | |
Make | Jaguar | Nissan |
Model | XK | Cedric |
Year Released | 2004 | 1975 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4193 cc | 1996 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 390 HP | 106 HP |
Engine RPM | 6100 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 541 Nm | 162 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1833 kg | 1350 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 4700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1290 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2590 mm | 2700 mm |