2004 Jaguar XK vs. 1979 Suzuki Cervo
To start off, 2004 Jaguar XK is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Suzuki Cervo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Suzuki Cervo would be higher. At 4,195 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Jaguar XK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Jaguar XK (294 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 265 more horse power than 1979 Suzuki Cervo. (29 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Jaguar XK should accelerate faster than 1979 Suzuki Cervo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Jaguar XK weights approximately 1174 kg more than 1979 Suzuki Cervo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Jaguar XK (411 Nm) has 370 more torque (in Nm) than 1979 Suzuki Cervo. (41 Nm). This means 2004 Jaguar XK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1979 Suzuki Cervo.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Jaguar XK | 1979 Suzuki Cervo | |
Make | Jaguar | Suzuki |
Model | XK | Cervo |
Year Released | 2004 | 1979 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 4195 cc | 543 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 294 HP | 29 HP |
Engine RPM | 6100 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 411 Nm | 41 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1714 kg | 540 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 3200 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1400 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1290 mm | 1220 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2590 mm | 2040 mm |