2004 Jaguar XK vs. 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 2004 Jaguar XK is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 4,194 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Jaguar XK is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Jaguar XK weights approximately 353 kg more than 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Jaguar XK | 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
Make | Jaguar | Oldsmobile |
Model | XK | Cutlass |
Year Released | 2004 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4194 cc | 3789 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 390 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1833 kg | 1480 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 5030 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1290 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2590 mm | 2760 mm |