2004 Jaguar XK vs. 1982 Zastava 132
To start off, 2004 Jaguar XK is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Zastava 132. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Zastava 132 would be higher. At 4,196 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Jaguar XK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Jaguar XK (390 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 284 more horse power than 1982 Zastava 132. (106 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Jaguar XK should accelerate faster than 1982 Zastava 132. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Jaguar XK weights approximately 660 kg more than 1982 Zastava 132. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Jaguar XK (525 Nm) has 383 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Zastava 132. (142 Nm). This means 2004 Jaguar XK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Zastava 132.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Jaguar XK | 1982 Zastava 132 | |
Make | Jaguar | Zastava |
Model | XK | 132 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1982 |
Engine Size | 4196 cc | 1756 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 390 HP | 106 HP |
Engine RPM | 6100 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 525 Nm | 142 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1758 kg | 1098 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 4410 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1280 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2590 mm | 2560 mm |