2004 Jaguar XK vs. 1983 Holden Commodore

To start off, 2004 Jaguar XK is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Holden Commodore. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Holden Commodore would be higher. At 4,195 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Jaguar XK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Jaguar XK (294 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 216 more horse power than 1983 Holden Commodore. (78 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Jaguar XK should accelerate faster than 1983 Holden Commodore. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Jaguar XK weights approximately 554 kg more than 1983 Holden Commodore. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Jaguar XK (411 Nm) has 271 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Holden Commodore. (140 Nm). This means 2004 Jaguar XK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Holden Commodore.

Compare all specifications:

2004 Jaguar XK 1983 Holden Commodore
Make Jaguar Holden
Model XK Commodore
Year Released 2004 1983
Body Type Coupe Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 4195 cc 1891 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Horse Power 294 HP 78 HP
Engine RPM 6100 RPM 4600 RPM
Torque 411 Nm 140 Nm
Drive Type Rear Rear
Number of Seats 4 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1714 kg 1160 kg
Vehicle Length 4770 mm 4710 mm
Vehicle Width 1800 mm 1730 mm
Vehicle Height 1290 mm 1370 mm
Wheelbase Size 2590 mm 2670 mm