2004 Jaguar XK vs. 1986 Renault 4

To start off, 2004 Jaguar XK is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Renault 4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Renault 4 would be higher. At 4,195 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Jaguar XK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Jaguar XK (294 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 260 more horse power than 1986 Renault 4. (34 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Jaguar XK should accelerate faster than 1986 Renault 4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Jaguar XK weights approximately 1110 kg more than 1986 Renault 4. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2004 Jaguar XK is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Jaguar XK. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Renault 4, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Jaguar XK (411 Nm) has 348 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Renault 4. (63 Nm). This means 2004 Jaguar XK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Renault 4.

Compare all specifications: