2004 Jaguar XK vs. 1994 Volvo 850
To start off, 2004 Jaguar XK is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Volvo 850. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Volvo 850 would be higher. At 4,195 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Jaguar XK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Jaguar XK (294 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 54 more horse power than 1994 Volvo 850. (240 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Jaguar XK should accelerate faster than 1994 Volvo 850.
Because 2004 Jaguar XK is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Jaguar XK. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1994 Volvo 850, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Jaguar XK (411 Nm) has 4 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Volvo 850. (407 Nm). This means 2004 Jaguar XK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Volvo 850.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Jaguar XK | 1994 Volvo 850 | |
| Make | Jaguar | Volvo |
| Model | XK | 850 |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1994 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4195 cc | 2319 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 294 HP | 240 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Torque | 411 Nm | 407 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 86.1 mm | 81 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 90 mm | 90 mm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 4670 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1770 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2590 mm | 2670 mm |
