2004 Jaguar XK vs. 1996 Tata E220
To start off, 2004 Jaguar XK is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Tata E220. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Tata E220 would be higher. At 4,195 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Jaguar XK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Jaguar XK (294 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 146 more horse power than 1996 Tata E220. (148 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Jaguar XK should accelerate faster than 1996 Tata E220. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Jaguar XK weights approximately 344 kg more than 1996 Tata E220. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Jaguar XK (411 Nm) has 201 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Tata E220. (210 Nm). This means 2004 Jaguar XK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Tata E220.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Jaguar XK | 1996 Tata E220 | |
Make | Jaguar | Tata |
Model | XK | E220 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4195 cc | 2197 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 294 HP | 148 HP |
Engine RPM | 6100 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 411 Nm | 210 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1714 kg | 1370 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 4750 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1750 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1290 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2590 mm | 2810 mm |