2004 Jaguar XK vs. 1999 Lotus M250
To start off, 2004 Jaguar XK is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Lotus M250. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Lotus M250 would be higher. At 4,193 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Jaguar XK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Jaguar XK (390 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 143 more horse power than 1999 Lotus M250. (247 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Jaguar XK should accelerate faster than 1999 Lotus M250. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Jaguar XK weights approximately 883 kg more than 1999 Lotus M250. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Jaguar XK (541 Nm) has 220 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Lotus M250. (321 Nm). This means 2004 Jaguar XK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Lotus M250.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Jaguar XK | 1999 Lotus M250 | |
Make | Jaguar | Lotus |
Model | XK | M250 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 4193 cc | 2946 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 390 HP | 247 HP |
Engine RPM | 6100 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 541 Nm | 321 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1833 kg | 950 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 4140 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1290 mm | 1180 mm |