2004 Jaguar XK vs. 1999 Noble M10
To start off, 2004 Jaguar XK is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Noble M10. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Noble M10 would be higher. At 4,195 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Jaguar XK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Jaguar XK (294 HP) has 126 more horse power than 1999 Noble M10. (168 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Jaguar XK should accelerate faster than 1999 Noble M10. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Jaguar XK weights approximately 845 kg more than 1999 Noble M10. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Jaguar XK (411 Nm) has 191 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Noble M10. (220 Nm). This means 2004 Jaguar XK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Noble M10.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Jaguar XK | 1999 Noble M10 | |
| Make | Jaguar | Noble |
| Model | XK | M10 |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1999 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 4195 cc | 2500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 294 HP | 168 HP |
| Torque | 411 Nm | 220 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1805 kg | 960 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 3870 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1760 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1170 mm |
