2004 Jaguar XK vs. 1999 Suzuki C2
To start off, 2004 Jaguar XK is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Suzuki C2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Suzuki C2 would be higher. At 4,195 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Jaguar XK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Jaguar XK (294 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 43 more horse power than 1999 Suzuki C2. (251 HP @ 7000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Jaguar XK should accelerate faster than 1999 Suzuki C2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Jaguar XK weights approximately 953 kg more than 1999 Suzuki C2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Jaguar XK (411 Nm) has 127 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Suzuki C2. (284 Nm). This means 2004 Jaguar XK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Suzuki C2.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Jaguar XK | 1999 Suzuki C2 | |
| Make | Jaguar | Suzuki |
| Model | XK | C2 |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1999 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4195 cc | 1600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 294 HP | 251 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 7000 RPM |
| Torque | 411 Nm | 284 Nm |
| Vehicle Weight | 1805 kg | 852 kg |
