2004 Jaguar XK vs. 2000 ZAZ Slavuta
To start off, 2004 Jaguar XK is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 ZAZ Slavuta. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 ZAZ Slavuta would be higher. At 4,195 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Jaguar XK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Jaguar XK (294 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 243 more horse power than 2000 ZAZ Slavuta. (51 HP @ 5300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Jaguar XK should accelerate faster than 2000 ZAZ Slavuta. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Jaguar XK weights approximately 969 kg more than 2000 ZAZ Slavuta. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 Jaguar XK is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Jaguar XK. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 ZAZ Slavuta, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Jaguar XK | 2000 ZAZ Slavuta | |
Make | Jaguar | ZAZ |
Model | XK | Slavuta |
Year Released | 2004 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4195 cc | 1091 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 294 HP | 51 HP |
Engine RPM | 6100 RPM | 5300 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 11.0:1 | 9.5:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1714 kg | 745 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 3990 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1590 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1290 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2590 mm | 2330 mm |