2004 Jaguar XK vs. 2002 Suzuki Twin
To start off, 2004 Jaguar XK is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Suzuki Twin. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Suzuki Twin would be higher. At 4,196 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Jaguar XK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Jaguar XK (390 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 348 more horse power than 2002 Suzuki Twin. (42 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Jaguar XK should accelerate faster than 2002 Suzuki Twin. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Jaguar XK weights approximately 1198 kg more than 2002 Suzuki Twin. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 Jaguar XK is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Jaguar XK. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Suzuki Twin, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Jaguar XK (525 Nm) has 468 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Suzuki Twin. (57 Nm). This means 2004 Jaguar XK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Suzuki Twin.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Jaguar XK | 2002 Suzuki Twin | |
Make | Jaguar | Suzuki |
Model | XK | Twin |
Year Released | 2004 | 2002 |
Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4196 cc | 658 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 390 HP | 42 HP |
Engine RPM | 6100 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 525 Nm | 57 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 86 mm | 68 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90 mm | 60.4 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.1:1 | 10.5:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1758 kg | 560 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 2740 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1480 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1280 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2590 mm | 1810 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 21 L |