2004 Jaguar XK vs. 2002 Vauxhall Omega

To start off, 2004 Jaguar XK is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Vauxhall Omega. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Vauxhall Omega would be higher. At 4,196 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Jaguar XK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Jaguar XK (390 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 248 more horse power than 2002 Vauxhall Omega. (142 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Jaguar XK should accelerate faster than 2002 Vauxhall Omega. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Jaguar XK weights approximately 153 kg more than 2002 Vauxhall Omega. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Jaguar XK (525 Nm) has 316 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Vauxhall Omega. (209 Nm). This means 2004 Jaguar XK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Vauxhall Omega.

Compare all specifications:

2004 Jaguar XK 2002 Vauxhall Omega
Make Jaguar Vauxhall
Model XK Omega
Year Released 2004 2002
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 4196 cc 2198 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 390 HP 142 HP
Engine RPM 6100 RPM 5400 RPM
Torque 525 Nm 209 Nm
Drive Type Rear Rear
Vehicle Weight 1758 kg 1605 kg
Vehicle Length 4770 mm 4900 mm
Vehicle Width 1800 mm 1790 mm
Vehicle Height 1280 mm 1460 mm
Wheelbase Size 2590 mm 2740 mm