2004 Jaguar XK vs. 2006 Mazda 3
To start off, 2006 Mazda 3 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Jaguar XK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Jaguar XK would be higher. At 4,195 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Jaguar XK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Jaguar XK (294 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 155 more horse power than 2006 Mazda 3. (139 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Jaguar XK should accelerate faster than 2006 Mazda 3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Jaguar XK weights approximately 671 kg more than 2006 Mazda 3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Jaguar XK (411 Nm) has 229 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Mazda 3. (182 Nm). This means 2004 Jaguar XK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Mazda 3.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Jaguar XK | 2006 Mazda 3 | |
Make | Jaguar | Mazda |
Model | XK | 3 |
Year Released | 2004 | 2006 |
Body Type | Convertible | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4195 cc | 1998 cc |
Horse Power | 294 HP | 139 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 411 Nm | 182 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 86.1 mm | 87.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90 mm | 83.1 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 11.0:1 | 10.0:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1805 kg | 1134 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 4710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1490 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2590 mm | 2650 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.2 L/100km | 8.5 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 55 L |