2004 Jaguar XK vs. 2008 Koenigsegg CCXR
To start off, 2008 Koenigsegg CCXR is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Jaguar XK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Jaguar XK would be higher. At 4,719 cc (8 cylinders), 2008 Koenigsegg CCXR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Koenigsegg CCXR (1,064 HP @ 7200 RPM) has 674 more horse power than 2004 Jaguar XK. (390 HP @ 6100 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Koenigsegg CCXR should accelerate faster than 2004 Jaguar XK. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Jaguar XK weights approximately 553 kg more than 2008 Koenigsegg CCXR.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Koenigsegg CCXR (1,060 Nm) has 519 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Jaguar XK. (541 Nm). This means 2008 Koenigsegg CCXR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Jaguar XK.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Jaguar XK | 2008 Koenigsegg CCXR | |
| Make | Jaguar | Koenigsegg |
| Model | XK | CCXR |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2008 |
| Body Type | Convertible | Roadster |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 4194 cc | 4719 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 390 HP | 1064 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6100 RPM | 7200 RPM |
| Torque | 541 Nm | 1060 Nm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.1:1 | 8.8:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1833 kg | 1280 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 4293 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1996 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1290 mm | 1120 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2590 mm | 2660 mm |
| Fuel Consumption | 10.2 L/100km | 18 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 13.1 L/100km | 22 L/100km |
