2004 Jaguar XK vs. 2008 Mazda DrifterX
To start off, 2008 Mazda DrifterX is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Jaguar XK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Jaguar XK would be higher. At 4,195 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Jaguar XK is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Jaguar XK weights approximately 225 kg more than 2008 Mazda DrifterX.
Because 2008 Mazda DrifterX is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 Jaguar XK. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Mazda DrifterX will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Jaguar XK (411 Nm) has 154 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Mazda DrifterX. (257 Nm). This means 2004 Jaguar XK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Mazda DrifterX.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Jaguar XK | 2008 Mazda DrifterX | |
Make | Jaguar | Mazda |
Model | XK | DrifterX |
Year Released | 2004 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4195 cc | 2499 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 3 valves |
Horse Power | 294 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 411 Nm | 257 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 11.0:1 | 21.6:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1805 kg | 1580 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 4500 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1760 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2590 mm | 3010 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.2 L/100km | 13.5 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 80 L |