2004 Jaguar XK vs. 2011 Mazda BT-50

To start off, 2011 Mazda BT-50 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Jaguar XK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Jaguar XK would be higher. At 4,194 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Jaguar XK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Jaguar XK (390 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 267 more horse power than 2011 Mazda BT-50. (123 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Jaguar XK should accelerate faster than 2011 Mazda BT-50. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Jaguar XK weights approximately 283 kg more than 2011 Mazda BT-50. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2011 Mazda BT-50 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 Jaguar XK. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Mazda BT-50 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Jaguar XK (541 Nm) has 335 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Mazda BT-50. (206 Nm). This means 2004 Jaguar XK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Mazda BT-50.

Compare all specifications:

2004 Jaguar XK 2011 Mazda BT-50
Make Jaguar Mazda
Model XK BT-50
Year Released 2004 2011
Body Type Convertible Pickup
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 4194 cc 2606 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 390 HP 123 HP
Engine RPM 6100 RPM 4600 RPM
Torque 541 Nm 206 Nm
Engine Compression Ratio 9.1:1 8.4:1
Drive Type Rear 4WD
Number of Seats 4 seats 2 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 1833 kg 1550 kg
Vehicle Height 1290 mm 1810 mm
Wheelbase Size 2590 mm 3010 mm
Fuel Consumption Overall 13.1 L/100km 13.1 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 75 L 50 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]