2004 Jaguar XK vs. 2012 BMW 325
To start off, 2012 BMW 325 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Jaguar XK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Jaguar XK would be higher. At 4,195 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Jaguar XK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Jaguar XK (294 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 77 more horse power than 2012 BMW 325. (217 HP @ 4400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Jaguar XK should accelerate faster than 2012 BMW 325.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 BMW 325 (450 Nm) has 39 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Jaguar XK. (411 Nm). This means 2012 BMW 325 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Jaguar XK.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Jaguar XK | 2012 BMW 325 | |
Make | Jaguar | BMW |
Model | XK | 325 |
Year Released | 2004 | 2012 |
Body Type | Convertible | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4195 cc | 1995 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 294 HP | 217 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Torque | 411 Nm | 450 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 86.1 mm | 90 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90 mm | 84 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 4624 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1811 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1384 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2590 mm | 2810 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 57 L |