2004 Jaguar XK vs. 2012 Chevrolet Aveo
To start off, 2012 Chevrolet Aveo is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Jaguar XK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Jaguar XK would be higher. At 4,196 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Jaguar XK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Jaguar XK (390 HP) has 291 more horse power than 2012 Chevrolet Aveo. (99 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Jaguar XK should accelerate faster than 2012 Chevrolet Aveo.
Because 2004 Jaguar XK is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Jaguar XK. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Chevrolet Aveo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Jaguar XK (525 Nm) has 395 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Chevrolet Aveo. (130 Nm). This means 2004 Jaguar XK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Chevrolet Aveo.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Jaguar XK | 2012 Chevrolet Aveo | |
| Make | Jaguar | Chevrolet |
| Model | XK | Aveo |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4196 cc | 1398 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 390 HP | 99 HP |
| Torque | 525 Nm | 130 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 4039 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1735 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1280 mm | 1516 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2590 mm | 2525 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 46 L |
