2004 Jaguar XK vs. 2012 Opel Ampera
To start off, 2012 Opel Ampera is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Jaguar XK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Jaguar XK would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Jaguar XK weights approximately 90 kg more than 2012 Opel Ampera.
Because 2004 Jaguar XK is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Jaguar XK. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Opel Ampera, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Jaguar XK | 2012 Opel Ampera | |
| Make | Jaguar | Opel |
| Model | XK | Ampera |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Convertible | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Horse Power | 294 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1805 kg | 1715 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 4498 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1788 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1438 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2590 mm | 2685 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Highway | 9.1 L/100km | 2.5 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 13.1 L/100km | 2.5 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 35 L |
