2004 Jeep Cherokee vs. 1976 Toyota Celica
To start off, 2004 Jeep Cherokee is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Toyota Celica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Toyota Celica would be higher. At 3,698 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Jeep Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Jeep Cherokee weights approximately 926 kg more than 1976 Toyota Celica.
Because 2004 Jeep Cherokee is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1976 Toyota Celica. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Jeep Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Jeep Cherokee | 1976 Toyota Celica | |
Make | Jeep | Toyota |
Model | Cherokee | Celica |
Year Released | 2004 | 1976 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3698 cc | 1968 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 207 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1951 kg | 1025 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4380 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1870 mm | 1330 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2510 mm |